It also observed that the primary reason for engaging the services of a security agency or security guards is to ensure a safe and respectful space, but when these employers or employees become "miscreants", assuming themselves to be extra-constitutional authorities, using threats and brute force as weapons, it becomes a cause of grave concern for the society.
Expressing concern over the use of the term "bouncer" by private security agencies for their workers, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has observed that it is intended to invoke "fear, anxiety, and terror in the minds of the public", which is "impermissible" in any civilised setup.
During the hearing, a single-judge bench of Justice Anoop Chitkara observed that the paramount concern for the court was the use of the term "bouncer" in the name of the security agency run by the petitioner.
The story "Use of term 'bouncer' intended to invoke fear, terror in public mind: HC" has 1039 words across 19 sentences, which will take approximately 5 - 9 minutes for the average person to read.
Which news outlet covered this story?
The story "Use of term 'bouncer' intended to invoke fear, terror in public mind: HC" was covered 9 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.
How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?
Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news.
The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 268 news stories per day.
It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.
What do people currently think of this news story?
The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.
How do I report this news for inaccuracy?
You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.
